httpd has never implemented obs-fold (RFC 2616 §2.2 / RFC 7230 §3.2.4 header continuation lines). Every CRLF followed by a non-CRLF octet unconditionally starts a new header. This missing feature bec
httpd has never implemented obs-fold (RFC 2616 §2.2 / RFC 7230 §3.2.4 header continuation lines). Every CRLF followed by a non-CRLF octet unconditionally starts a new header. This missing feature became a security concern as the understanding of HTTP request smuggling attacks evolved. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from
Affected packages
- erlang
Exploit signal
- Known exploited (CISA KEV)
- No
- EPSS score
- —
- EPSS percentile
- —
EPSS is the probability a CVE is exploited in the wild; percentile is its rank among all CVEs.
Sources
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66357
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qh2f-33hj-37qf
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-66357.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-66357
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/220d618d2479a7180b4a06d0c5aacfaa4af4a85b
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/273d8958de38ff2a7fe0c5dcc5b6bfe6f65717f3
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e640d599287d2eba919e6f13b91f042d7dbe6ff4
Structured record: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-66357
Recommended response stack
Some links are affiliate links — HackTribune may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Get incidents like this as alerts for your stack.
Join the beta